Menu
JPR Advocaten

The Netherlands has come to a standstill In large parts of the Netherlands new economic activities are not possible

Geschreven op 12 augustus 2019  •  Auteur: Ruurd van Eck
The Netherlands has come to a standstill In large parts of the Netherlands new economic activities are not possible

Under the Habitats and the Birds Directive (Directive 92/43/EEC), a network of nature conservation areas has been set up in Europe: the Natura 2000 network for the conservation of biodiversity. Pursuant to those regulations the Member States are obliged to designate areas that are to be protected and to protect them against adverse effects of developments. The Netherlands contains 162 of such areas (see map: https://www.synbiosys.alterra.nl/natura2000/googlemapszoek2.aspx). In principle, new economic activities are no longer possible in those areas. The Netherlands has come to a standstill.

The designation order specifies the goals that are pursued with respect to the area. Next, a management plan is drawn up, which plan describes the manner in which those goals will be achieved. In particular, the designation orders list the aspects of the area that need to be protected and specify the quality thereof.

When it comes to plans or projects, for example the construction of houses, the construction of a road or the expansion of a company, it must be assessed whether or not they will adversely affect the nature present in the areas, the so-called appropriate assessment.

Permission for an activity can only be given in case it has been ascertained that the integrity of the area will not be adversely affected (Art. 6 paragraph 3 Directive 92/43/EEC).

In the Netherlands, 118 of 162 Natura 2000 areas have a nitrogen overload. Nitrogen is a substance that some plants thrive on and others do not. Simply stated, the effect is that blackberry bushes and nettles will start to grow everywhere. Other plants will be choked, with all the associated consequences for the animals that live in the area concerned. The overload is therefore a threat to the Natura 2000 area. Wherever there is an overload, nitrogen deposition, and therefore emissions in the surrounding area, may not increase.

Large quantities of nitrogen are released in case of combustion and in the livestock industry, for example.

Integrated Approach to Nitrogen is unusable

As a result of the regulations, no new economic activities could be developed in large parts of the Netherlands. In order to prevent the economy from stagnating, the Dutch government developed a policy in 2015, a standard for the appropriate assessment: measures that, in accordance with agreements, would be implemented in the future by livestock farmers and autonomous developments due to improved technology were expected to result in lower nitrogen emissions in the future. Part of the room that would become available as a result of this could be used for economic development purposes.

Within the scope of this project, a calculation tool was developed with which it could be calculated whether or not the nitrogen emissions were so low that a permit was not necessary or that the emissions were at such level that a permit could be granted.

This legislation is called the Integrated Approach to Nitrogen, “PAS”.

After seeking advice from the European Court of Justice (ECLI:EU:2018:882), the Council of State, the court, ruled, on 29 May 2019, that the PAS does not comply with the requirements under the law. (Administrative Jurisdiction Division of Council of State 29 May 2019, ECLI:NL:RVS:2019:1603):

A number of measures in the PAS are necessary to protect nature against further deterioration and cannot be used to create economic room. Where this is not the case, the effects of the measures are not guaranteed sufficiently to be allowed to make use of them.

Because the PAS has become unusable, the calculation system that is used to determine the nitrogen emissions has also become unusable.

18,000 construction projects affected

The consequence of the ruling is that during this summer no permits could be granted for activities in the wide surrounding areas of Natura 2000 areas. An investigation has shown that 18,000 construction projects have been affected: 125 projects of more than 500 houses each, 275 large business parks, 2,000 agricultural construction projects, construction of roads including the widening of the main infrastructure such as the A1.

The government is now investigating solutions for the problems. In any case, as from 16 September a new calculation tool is available. This does not resolve the problem, but it does make it possible to once again assess whether or not an activity will adversely affect a Natura 2000 area. If that is not the case, it is once again possible to grant a permit.

Three solutions

In the short term, three solutions are available for activities that, considered on their own, result in an increase of nitrogen deposition on a Natura 2000 area:

  • Internal compensation, where in case of an expansion of an activity measures are taken in respect of the existing activity to reduce emissions on a pro rata basis;
  • External compensation, where old activities are ceased in combination with the new activity. For example, buying out a livestock farmer in order to be able to build houses;
  • The so-called ADC test in case of large projects of public interest (Art. 6 paragraph 4 Directive 92/43/EEC).


In the longer term

On 25 September the government was provided with a first recommendation for tackling the problem.
Recommendations were made to lower the speed limit on relevant roads to 100 km/hour as soon as possible and to encourage livestock farms near Natura 2000 areas to take emission-reducing measures or to buy out the farmers. Options in the construction and industrial sectors should also be investigated.

In all cases an emissions reduction cannot be fully used for developments. There will have to be an overall reduction.
A more elaborate recommendation is expected in the summer of 2020.

The Netherlands has a problem, but, as always, that problem will be resolved. In our own words: “things will turn out fine”. In the meantime, foreign investors should have projects assessed carefully before signing up. I will keep you informed.


Ruurd van Eck
Ruurd van Eck

“Wat mij intrigeert, is de verhouding tussen de ondernemer en de maatschappij. De interactie tussen het algemeen nut en de individuele vrijheid. Wat ik vaak tegenkom, is de onrechtvaardigheid en het gemak waarmee overheden tornen aan de belangen en rechten van individuele burgers. Als advocaat is het mijn uitdaging daarin tegenwicht te bieden.

Met wetenschappelijke nieuwsgierigheid kun je dagenlang bezig zijn, maar de klant wil een oplossing. Pleiten is boksen, maar dan intellectueel, binnen de regels. In het verlengde van mijn specialisatie omgevingsrecht (milieu, bouw, overheidsaansprakelijkheid en voedselveiligheid) ben ik voorzitter van de Raad van Toezicht Stichting Secure Feed. Een stichting die bijna 400 bedrijven verenigt in het streven voedselveiligheid te waarborgen.”

Over Ruurd

Al bijna 30 jaar is Ruurd een bevlogen advocaat en hij is partner bij JPR Advocaten. Ook adviseert en begeleidt hij startups. Ruurd staat voor een helder en praktisch advies, zodat het meteen toepasbaar is voor de klant.

Contact opnemen met JPR

Op de hoogte blijven?
Meld u aan voor de nieuwsbrief: